<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Maritime Injury Law Blog</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:blog.maritimelawyer.us,2010://1</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1" title="Maritime Injury Law Blog" />
    <updated>2010-09-02T22:40:41Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Published By Beard Stacey &amp; Jacobsen, LLP</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.33</generator>
 
<entry>
    <title>Oregon Crewman Airlifted from Boat with Head Injuries</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/2010/09/oregon_crewman_airlifted_from.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=201" title="Oregon Crewman Airlifted from Boat with Head Injuries" />
    <id>tag:blog.maritimelawyer.us,2010://1.201</id>
    
    <published>2010-09-02T22:36:19Z</published>
    <updated>2010-09-02T22:40:41Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A crewman suffered a head injury on Tuesday and was airlifted from a fishing vessel 50 miles off the Oregon Coast. The cause of the accident is unknown at this time. Two Coast Guard helicopters responded to the emergency. The...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Beard Stacey &amp; Jacobsen, LLP </name>
        <uri>http://www.maritimelawyer.us/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Injury at Sea" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A crewman suffered a head injury on Tuesday and was airlifted from a fishing vessel 50 miles off the Oregon Coast.  The cause of the accident is unknown at this time.  Two Coast Guard helicopters responded to the emergency.  The crewman was taken to North Bend for treatment. Commercial fishermen working in Oregon and Washington continue to suffer injuries at an alarming rate.  Every vessel owner owes their crewmen a safe place to work and a seaworthy vessel.  In cases of serious injuries, crewmen must be evacuated for treatment as soon as possible.  This is particularly true in head injury cases, where the extent of crewmen’s injuries may not be readily apparent, and complications can have delayed onset. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Westport Fisherman Injured on Fishing Vessel RONDYS</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/2010/08/westport_fisherman_injured_on.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=200" title="Westport Fisherman Injured on Fishing Vessel RONDYS" />
    <id>tag:blog.maritimelawyer.us,2010://1.200</id>
    
    <published>2010-08-12T23:47:42Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-12T23:50:10Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A crewman working aboard the fishing vessel RONDYS suffered a head injury requiring emergency medical evacuation today. The accident happened 160 miles off shore from Westport. The fishing vessel RONDYS is a 113-foot steel hulled vessel built in 1993; records...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Beard Stacey &amp; Jacobsen, LLP </name>
        <uri>http://www.maritimelawyer.us/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Injury at Sea" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A crewman working aboard the fishing vessel RONDYS suffered a head injury requiring emergency medical evacuation today.   The accident happened 160 miles off shore from Westport.  The fishing vessel RONDYS is a 113-foot steel hulled vessel built in 1993; records indicate the vessel is owned by Rondys Tendering LLC of Westport.  The crewman was airlifted to Emanuel Hospital in Portland for treatment, and his condition is unknown.  What caused the accident is unknown at this time.<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>British Columbia Ferry Rams Dock - Six Passengers Injured </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/2010/08/british_columbia_ferry_rams_do.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=199" title="British Columbia Ferry Rams Dock - Six Passengers Injured " />
    <id>tag:blog.maritimelawyer.us,2010://1.199</id>
    
    <published>2010-08-09T22:00:39Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-09T22:04:20Z</updated>
    
    <summary>One passenger was airlifted to a hospital in Vancouver with possible head injuries after a British Columbia Ferry, Queen of Nanaimo, carrying 207 passengers, rammed a ferry dock on Mayne Island near Victoria. Five other persons were also injured in...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Beard Stacey &amp; Jacobsen, LLP </name>
        <uri>http://www.maritimelawyer.us/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Ferry Incidents" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/">
        <![CDATA[<p>One passenger was airlifted to a hospital in Vancouver with possible head injuries after a British Columbia Ferry, Queen of Nanaimo, carrying 207 passengers, rammed a ferry dock on Mayne Island near Victoria.  Five other persons were also injured in Tuesday’s accident.  The captain of the ferry capable of carrying up to 192 vehicles apparently was unable to put the vessel in reverse and tried to drop the ferry’s anchor before colliding with the dock.  Subsequent investigation found ropes in the wheel of the ferry.  The ferry had reportedly run over a crab pot during the ferry trip, and it is speculated that the line in the wheel resulted in other mechanical failure.  The British Columbia ferries have had ongoing problems with crab fishermen along the ferry’s route.  The ferries frequently encounter crab pots along the ferry route, resulting in lines becoming entangled in the ferry’s wheel.  It is unknown whether or not the captain of the Queen of Nanaimo was able to alert the passengers of the impending collision before the accident happened.  Investigation into the accident will be ongoing. <br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Trident Buys Icicle’s Surimi Plant In Bellingham</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/2010/08/trident_buys_icicles_surimi_pl.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=197" title="Trident Buys Icicle’s Surimi Plant In Bellingham" />
    <id>tag:blog.maritimelawyer.us,2010://1.197</id>
    
    <published>2010-08-04T18:42:41Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-04T18:45:54Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Trident Seafoods has announced the purchase of Icicle Seafoods’ surimi seafood plant in Bellingham, Washington. The sale is scheduled to close on August 16, 2010. Trident is recognized as one of the largest seafood companies in North America. The transaction...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Beard Stacey &amp; Jacobsen, LLP </name>
        <uri>http://www.maritimelawyer.us/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Interesting Info" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Trident Seafoods has announced the purchase of Icicle Seafoods’ surimi seafood plant in Bellingham, Washington.  The sale is scheduled to close on August 16, 2010.  Trident is recognized as one of the largest seafood companies in North America.  The transaction is part of Trident’s plan to expand its retail presence and become more vertically integrated.  Trident harvests, processes and markets a wide range of products including pollock, salmon, crab, and cod.  The most recognizable surimi product consumed in the United States is artificial crab and lobster.  Trident targets fisheries in the Bering Sea, Gulf of Alaska, and off the coasts of Washington and Oregon.   Icicle has indicated the proceeds of the sale will be reinvested in the company. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>The Slimy Sea - Employers Hacking Into Injured Crewmen’s Shipboard E-mails</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/2010/08/the_slimy_sea_employers_hackin.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=196" title="The Slimy Sea - Employers Hacking Into Injured Crewmen’s Shipboard E-mails" />
    <id>tag:blog.maritimelawyer.us,2010://1.196</id>
    
    <published>2010-08-02T21:10:07Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-02T21:27:26Z</updated>
    
    <summary>For the past ten years, maritime workers aboard ships and fishing vessels at sea have been able to cheaply stay in contact with their wives, children and girlfriends, and even run a shoreside business, utilizing the ship’s e-mail system. There...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Beard Stacey &amp; Jacobsen, LLP </name>
        <uri>http://www.maritimelawyer.us/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Legal Cases &amp; Concerns" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/">
        <![CDATA[<p>For the past ten years, maritime workers aboard ships and fishing vessels at sea have been able to cheaply stay in contact with their wives, children and girlfriends, and even run a shoreside business, utilizing the ship’s e-mail system. There has never been much privacy on a ship at sea, but most crewmen think their ship-to-shore e-mails to their wives and girlfriends are confidential.   Few crewmen realize that those e-mails on company provided computers and accounts may not be confidential, even though the crewman is using a private password.   A recent United States Supreme Court decision, <em>City of Ontario v. Jeff Quon, et al., </em>130 S.Ct. 2366, suggests that employees utilizing company owned computers may not have a reasonable expectation of privacy that their e-mails will not be read by their employer.  </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Many crewmen quickly learn that when they are injured at work they are suddenly no longer a valued employee but, rather, damaged goods.  The tactics employed by vessel owners in defending seaman personal injury suits have always been a dirty business.   When a serious injury has occurred as the result of negligence, many maritime employers typically begin an attack on the crewman’s character.   The defense dredges through the crewman’s history, trying to find evidence about the crewman’s criminal history, prior injuries, prior injury claims, prior employment problems, failure to pay taxes, and drug and alcohol issues. <br />
  <br />
That dirty business has gotten dirtier with maritime employers hacking into the seaman’s e-mail accounts to read the crewman’s personal messages.   The hacking into employee e-mails is highly abusive, because there are no checks or balances on what is and is not relevant to a possible injury claim.  In defense of an injury or employment claim, some employers utilize the hacked e-mails to embarrass, intimidate, or harass the injured seaman who is seeking compensation for his/her injuries.  </p>

<p><u><strong>Why would an employer want to find out what is in the crewman’s e-mail messages?</strong></u>  A maritime employer involved in a dispute with a crewman over wages, personal injury, or employment discrimination may hack into the crewman’s  e-mail account  to try to discover the content of the crewman’s messages and to whom and from whom he has been receiving electronic mail.  For example, in an injury case the e-mails could contain a description of how or when the injury occurred.  While the employer may have a legitimate reason to look in the e-mails for discoverable information to defend the claims against it, the Court Rules provide for proper ways to ask for this information, allowing a crewman to obtain a protective order to prevent disclosure of non-relevant evidence of a highly personal nature.  This all might be reasonable; however, once into the crewman’s e-mail accounts the employer is free to dig through the files and messages and review material of a personal and private nature that is not remotely relevant to the injury claim. </p>

<p>No doubt you will hear the argument from the employer that they would not stoop to such sleazy tactics.   The reality is that the employer will utilize such tactics.  In a recent case involving a confidential settlement, maritime lawyers Beard Stacey & Jacobsen represented a crewman who had worked for nearly ten years aboard a fish processing vessel in the Bering Sea.  The crewman slipped and fell down some stairs, requiring two back surgeries that ended his six-figure career as a fisherman.  A case was brought against the employer for personal injuries under the Jones Act.   Prior to his injury, the crewman had used the shipboard computer to exchange many intimate and explicit e-mails with several different girlfriends over the course of four to five years.  After hacking into the crewman’s computer, the employer used the e-mails to defend the injury case, claiming the e-mails violated company policy because of their explicit nature, and claiming the crewman violated the company’s non-fraternization policy.  Not stopping, his employer utilized the e-mails in an attempt to embarrass and harass the crewman, making contrived arguments so it could show the e-mails to psychologists, medical care providers, and company employees to prejudice and taint all evidence in the case.  On the pretext that the emails did not mention the crewman’s back injury or physical limitations, the employer’s attorney took the crewman’s girlfriend’s deposition and asked her about the explicit e-mails.  The slimy defense of this claim focused little on the facts of the accident or the nature of the crewman’s injury but, instead, the defense relied upon a tactic of trying to prejudice a jury by getting in evidence of the sexually laden content of the crewman’s e-mails.  </p>

<p>Despite these tactics, the crewman remained unphased and sought to get full and complete compensation for his injuries, and justice was done.  Before the court had an opportunity to rule on the admissibility of the e-mails, this crewman was able to fight this slimy tactic with a simple response: He produced multiple e-mails from the company’s management with pornography photographs attached to the e-mails that had been distributed throughout his vessel.   It was clear there was no company policy against sending explicit e-mails, and if there was such a policy it was not enforced, and it was violated by management itself.  Depositions and requests for production were demanded for all of management’s computers to see if they contained further sexually oriented content and photogrpahs.  After discovery of management’s pornographic e-mails, and facing depositions of its own high management officers, the case settled with an agreement that the settlement amount must remain confidential.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Crewman Injured Aboard Scallop Boat EILEEN MARIE</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/2010/07/crewman_injured_aboard_scallop.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=195" title="Crewman Injured Aboard Scallop Boat EILEEN MARIE" />
    <id>tag:blog.maritimelawyer.us,2010://1.195</id>
    
    <published>2010-07-26T17:04:24Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-26T17:07:05Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A 61 year old crewman was evacuated from the 88-foot scallop boat EILEEN MARIE on Saturday. The crewman reportedly had been hit on the head by a scallop dredge and was barely responsive. The accident happened 50 miles off the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Beard Stacey &amp; Jacobsen, LLP </name>
        <uri>http://www.maritimelawyer.us/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Injury at Sea" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A 61 year old crewman was evacuated from the 88-foot scallop boat EILEEN MARIE on Saturday.  The crewman reportedly had been hit on the head by a scallop dredge and was barely responsive.  The accident happened 50 miles off the coast of Cape May.  The Eileen Marie is home ported in New Bedford, Massachusetts.  The Coast Guard airlifted the crewman for emergency medical treatment at AtlaniCare Regional Hospital in Atlantic City for treatment.   The cause of the accident is unknown.</p>

<p>Beard Stacey & Jacobsen is one of the nation’s leading maritime injury firms.  A Boston jury returned a two million dollar verdict for their client last year in a case involving a New England scallop boat.  Crewmen working on scallop boats are at high risk for injuries, given the nature of the dredging operation and deck work. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Alaska Fishing Vessel Issues Mayday - Crew of Polar Star Safe</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/2010/07/alaska_fishing_vessel_issues_m.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=194" title="Alaska Fishing Vessel Issues Mayday - Crew of Polar Star Safe" />
    <id>tag:blog.maritimelawyer.us,2010://1.194</id>
    
    <published>2010-07-21T16:42:11Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-21T16:46:12Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Tuesday, the 58-foot seiner POLAR STAR ran aground and began taking on water 65 miles west of Kodiak. The crew of the vessel issued a mayday message indicating the crew of five were abandoning ship into the vessel’s seine skiff....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Beard Stacey &amp; Jacobsen, LLP </name>
        <uri>http://www.maritimelawyer.us/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Vessel Groundings" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Tuesday, the 58-foot seiner POLAR STAR ran aground and began taking on water 65 miles west of Kodiak.  The crew of the vessel issued a mayday message indicating the crew of five were abandoning ship into the vessel’s seine skiff.  The Coast Guard responded to the emergency via helicopter.  The crew planned to return to the vessel at high tide to see if they could refloat the vessel.  The cause of the grounding was unknown.  Weather conditions at the time of the accident were mild, with 23 knot winds and three-foot seas.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>FISHING VESSEL SINKS OFF WASHINGTON COAST; CREWMAN SAVED</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/2010/07/fishing_vessel_sinks_off_washi.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=193" title="FISHING VESSEL SINKS OFF WASHINGTON COAST; CREWMAN SAVED" />
    <id>tag:blog.maritimelawyer.us,2010://1.193</id>
    
    <published>2010-07-20T22:48:27Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-20T22:51:05Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The 34 foot fishing boat ROSIE MARIE sank 20 miles west of the Columbia River Bar on Tuesday. The sole crewman on the vessel was able to get off a May Day message and activate his EPIRB before abandoning the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Beard Stacey &amp; Jacobsen, LLP </name>
        <uri>http://www.maritimelawyer.us/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Vessel Sinkings" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The 34 foot fishing boat ROSIE MARIE sank 20 miles west of the Columbia River Bar on Tuesday.  The sole crewman on the vessel was able to get off a May Day message and activate his EPIRB before abandoning the sinking vessel into a life raft.  The Coast Guard sent a helicopter from Astoria and a life boat from Cape Disappointment to rescue the man who was hoisted to safety by the helicopter.  The crewman was taken to Astoria Oregon for medical examination.  The cause of the accident is under investigation.  Safety regulations relating to small fishing boats such as this are currently pending, including requirements for life rafts, EPIRB, and immersion suits.  This instance again points to the fact that this safety equipment saves the lives of fishermen and the need to make such safety equipment mandatory on all fishing vessels.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Four Saved After Alaska Fishing Boat Burns and Sinks</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/2010/07/four_saved_after_alaska_fishin.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=192" title="Four Saved After Alaska Fishing Boat Burns and Sinks" />
    <id>tag:blog.maritimelawyer.us,2010://1.192</id>
    
    <published>2010-07-13T18:40:16Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-13T18:44:37Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Four crewmen have been rescued after their Alaska fishing boat caught fire on Sunday. The 52-foot longliner NAKAT from Kodiak caught fire about 80 miles southwest of Kodiak. The crew was unable to issue a mayday message before abandoning ship...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Beard Stacey &amp; Jacobsen, LLP </name>
        <uri>http://www.maritimelawyer.us/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Four crewmen have been rescued after their Alaska fishing boat caught fire on Sunday.  The 52-foot longliner NAKAT from Kodiak caught fire about 80 miles southwest of Kodiak.  The crew was unable to issue a mayday message before abandoning ship into the vessel’s life raft. The Coast Guard was alerted to the accident after receiving an EPIRB message from the vessel and immediately dispatched a rescue helicopter.  The crew was located several miles away from the burning vessel and hoisted to safety.  The cause of the fire is under investigation.  This case again demonstrates the importance of the EPIRB and the role it plays in saving fishermen’s lives in Alaska. <br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Highland Light Pays $135,000 EPA Penalty</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/2010/07/highland_light_pays_135000_epa_1.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=191" title="Highland Light Pays $135,000 EPA Penalty" />
    <id>tag:blog.maritimelawyer.us,2010://1.191</id>
    
    <published>2010-07-09T21:44:29Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-09T21:47:54Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Highland Light Seafoods, a Seattle Seafood Processor headquartered in Seattle, has agreed to pay a $135,00 penalty for violations of the Clean Water Act. The violations stem from an inspection of the 160 foot WESTWARD WIND in December of 2008...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Beard Stacey &amp; Jacobsen, LLP </name>
        <uri>http://www.maritimelawyer.us/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Interesting Info" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Highland Light Seafoods, a Seattle Seafood Processor headquartered in Seattle, has agreed to pay a $135,00 penalty for violations of the Clean Water Act.  The violations stem from an inspection of the 160 foot WESTWARD WIND in December of 2008 and involve multiple alleged violations over a five year period.  The EPA charged that the WESTWARD WIND was not in compliance with its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit (NPDES).   Allegations included improper discharges of waste product, failure to maintain records, excessive discharges of waste.   A Spokesman for the EPA stated that “monitoring is the cornerstone of the NPDES Program and provides real time input for the company on the effectiveness of its operation.  Using monitoring to improve operations is an important step in reducing the effects of discharge on the environment. <br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Tour Boat Accident in Boston Harbor – 174 Passengers Evacuated From Whale Watch Boat</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/2010/07/tour_boat_accident_in_boston_h.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=189" title="Tour Boat Accident in Boston Harbor – 174 Passengers Evacuated From Whale Watch Boat" />
    <id>tag:blog.maritimelawyer.us,2010://1.189</id>
    
    <published>2010-07-09T01:46:16Z</published>
    <updated>2010-07-09T01:49:15Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A Boston whale watch boat ran aground on a rocky ledge and began taking on water, forcing evacuation of 174 passengers and crewmen. The accident happened on July 3rd near Deer Island in Boston Harbor. The 87-foot long tour boat...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Beard Stacey &amp; Jacobsen, LLP </name>
        <uri>http://www.maritimelawyer.us/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Vessel Groundings" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A Boston whale watch boat ran aground on a rocky ledge and began taking on water, forcing evacuation of 174 passengers and crewmen.  The accident happened on July 3rd near Deer Island in Boston Harbor.  The 87-foot long tour boat MASSACHUSETTS was reportedly traveling at 18 knots when it struck rocks at a place called Devil’s Back Ledge.  The tour boat began to take on water and list with its bow down.   Numerous vessels in the area assisted the Coast Guard in rescuing the passengers who were taken three miles to a pier in Hull.  Remarkably, no serious injuries were noted at the time of the accident although the unexpected collision threw many passengers to the deck.  The MASSACHUSETTS is owned by Massachusetts Bay Lines of Boston, which owns and operates harbor cruises and tours. <br />
The accident is under investigation by the Coast Guard.   Devil’s ledge/rock is a well known navigational hazard in Boston Harbor and it appears that navigational error will be the focus of the investigation.  Even in well known and charted waters, vessel owners and tour operators must be fully ready to respond in case of a disaster.  </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Barge Collides With Fishing Vessel, Leaving Two Dead</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/2010/06/barge_collides_with_fishing_ve.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=187" title="Barge Collides With Fishing Vessel, Leaving Two Dead" />
    <id>tag:blog.maritimelawyer.us,2010://1.187</id>
    
    <published>2010-06-28T20:15:00Z</published>
    <updated>2010-06-28T22:40:22Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The tow boat BEAR CAT has been involved in a collision with a small pleasure craft on the Tennessee River. Only one of three persons aboard the small craft survived the accident. Early reports about the June 19, 2010 accident...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Beard Stacey &amp; Jacobsen, LLP </name>
        <uri>http://www.maritimelawyer.us/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Vessel Collisions" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The tow boat BEAR CAT has been involved in a collision with a small pleasure craft on the Tennessee River.  Only one of three persons aboard the small craft survived the accident.  Early reports about the June 19, 2010 accident indicate that neither the tow boat nor the small boat was aware of the impending collision.  The cause of the accident and why lookouts aboard the tug failed to sound a warning is under investigation by the Coast Guard.  The BEAR CAT is owned by Serodino Inc. of Chattanooga. </p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Woman Killed On Seattle Construction Barge</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/2010/06/woman_killed_on_seattle_constr.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=186" title="Woman Killed On Seattle Construction Barge" />
    <id>tag:blog.maritimelawyer.us,2010://1.186</id>
    
    <published>2010-06-26T20:09:36Z</published>
    <updated>2010-06-28T23:13:12Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A Seattle woman has been killed aboard a construction barge in Seattle. The woman’s relationship to the construction barge working in Seattle’s Elliott Bay is unknown. The death was reportedly the result of the woman being hit in the head...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Beard Stacey &amp; Jacobsen, LLP </name>
        <uri>http://www.maritimelawyer.us/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Regions" />
            <category term="Washington State" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A Seattle woman has been killed aboard a construction barge in Seattle.  The woman’s relationship to the construction barge working in Seattle’s Elliott Bay is unknown.  The death was reportedly the result of the woman being hit in the head by a crane on the barge.  The barge was moored just south of Seattle’s downtown waterfront. </p>

<p>Workers aboard marine construction barges may be classified as Jones Act seamen.  The legal status of an accident victim is critical to determine what compensation may available in the case of a wrongful death.  </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Alaska State Representative Cited for Fisheries Violation</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/2010/06/alaska_state_representative_ci.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=185" title="Alaska State Representative Cited for Fisheries Violation" />
    <id>tag:blog.maritimelawyer.us,2010://1.185</id>
    
    <published>2010-06-17T21:59:21Z</published>
    <updated>2010-06-28T22:40:22Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Wesley Keller, a member of the Alaska State House of Representatives, and Vice Chair of the Alaska House Fisheries Special Committee, was cited June 11, 2010, for an illegal sport fishing violation. Keller was fishing with two poles near the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Beard Stacey &amp; Jacobsen, LLP </name>
        <uri>http://www.maritimelawyer.us/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Legal Cases &amp; Concerns" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Wesley Keller, a member of the Alaska State House of Representatives, and Vice Chair of the Alaska House Fisheries Special Committee, was cited June 11, 2010, for an illegal sport fishing violation.  Keller was fishing with two poles near the entrance to Halibut Cove in Kachemak Bay.  He was issued a $110 citation for the violation.   Keller, who is a republican from Wasilla, was elected to the Alaska House of Representatives in 2008. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Undocumented Immigrant Entitled to Benefits For Injury Under Longshore Harbor Worker Compensation Act</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/2010/06/undocumented_immigrant_entitle.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=184" title="Undocumented Immigrant Entitled to Benefits For Injury Under Longshore Harbor Worker Compensation Act" />
    <id>tag:blog.maritimelawyer.us,2010://1.184</id>
    
    <published>2010-06-15T20:28:37Z</published>
    <updated>2010-06-28T23:44:27Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The Federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has recently held that an undocumented immigrant who is injured at work is not excluded from receiving benefits under the Longshore Harbor Workers Act. In Bollinger Shipyards v. U.S. Department of Labor et...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Beard Stacey &amp; Jacobsen, LLP </name>
        <uri>http://www.maritimelawyer.us/</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Employment Law" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.maritimelawyer.us/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has recently held that an undocumented immigrant who is injured at work is not excluded from receiving benefits under the Longshore Harbor Workers Act.  In <em>Bollinger Shipyards v. U.S. Department of Labor et al</em>., 2010 WL 1614594 (2010) an alien without proper working papers submitted a false Social Security number to obtain employment in a shipyard as a pipe fitter.  Arguing that the undocumented worker was precluded from compensation benefits because he was ineligible to work in the United States, the employer argued that the injured worker was similar to a “car thief,” a “pirate,” or a “drug dealer” who was making money through “ill gotten gains.”   The Fifth Circuit rejected the employer’s argument, affirming its prior decision in <em>Hernandez v. M/V RAJAAN</em>, and again declared that undocumented immigrants are eligible to recover workers’ compensation benefits under the Longshore Harbor Workers Act. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

